moai-foundation-thinking

Structured thinking for problem-solving coordinates critical evaluation, diverge-converge brainstorming, and deep questioning workflows to rigorously analyze proposals, generate options, and assess project risks.

Run a diverge-converge brainstorming session through five phases: gather requirements, generate 20-50 ideas, cluster themes, converge with scoring, and document validation plans to finalize selected options.

The best way to evaluate proposals is a 7-step critical evaluation process to restate claims, assess evidence, detect fallacies, expose assumptions, identify alternatives, check contradictions, and evaluate burden of proof.

Frame problems using a six-layer progressive deep questioning inquiry to reveal root causes, constraints, user perspectives, and risk factors before generating solutions or conducting evaluations.

Yes, you can apply these integrated thinking frameworks to risk assessment across multiple teams and projects, using critical evaluation and deep questioning to expose constraints and validate factors.

Diverge-converge brainstorming requires strict adherence to its five-phase cycle including generating 20-50 ideas and clustering themes; skipping the validation documentation phase limits rigorous problem-solving outcomes.