moai-workflow-ddd

Refactor legacy code while preserving behavior using AST analysis and characterization tests.

Updated Mar 11, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/thkim2015/pdf-tool --skill moai-workflow-ddd-thkim2015
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: moai-workflow-ddd
Source: https://github.com/thkim2015/pdf-tool/tree/main/.claude/skills/moai-workflow-ddd
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/thkim2015/pdf-tool --skill moai-workflow-ddd-thkim2015

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill enables systematic refactoring of existing codebases to improve structure and reduce technical debt while strictly preserving existing behavior.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Legacy Code Refactoring: Safely restructure old code without introducing regressions.
  • Behavior Preservation: Ensures functional equivalence through characterization tests and AST analysis.
  • Use Case: Refactor a complex, monolithic Python service into smaller, more maintainable modules by identifying domain boundaries and incrementally restructuring code with a robust test safety net.

Quick Start

Use the moai-workflow-ddd skill to refactor the legacy codebase by following the ANALYZE-PRESERVE-IMPROVE cycle.

Frequently Asked Questions about moai-workflow-ddd

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I refactor legacy code without changing its behavior?

Behavior-preserving refactoring uses AST analysis to understand code structure and characterization tests to lock in existing functionality, ensuring technical debt reduction introduces zero regressions during modernization.

How do I use ast-grep for domain-driven code modernization?

Ast-grep enables semantic code manipulation for modernization by matching abstract syntax trees, allowing safe structural transformations while identifying and preserving domain boundaries within legacy monolithic services.

What is the best way to migrate APIs in a legacy codebase safely?

The best way to migrate APIs safely is using a structured cycle that leverages AST analysis for semantic manipulation and robust testing frameworks to validate functional equivalence before and after migration.

Do I need characterization tests to restructure a monolithic service?

Yes, characterization tests are required to capture existing behavior before restructuring. They provide a robust safety net that validates functional equivalence when breaking down a monolithic service into modules.

When should I not use AST analysis for refactoring?

AST analysis for refactoring should be avoided when there is no robust testing framework available to validate behavior preservation, as structural transformations without test validation risk introducing regressions.