model-review

Simulate expert judges to review modeling proposals and identify weaknesses.

1|Updated Apr 2, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Best6668/AMIS --skill model-review-best6668
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: model-review
Source: https://github.com/Best6668/AMIS/tree/main/skills/model-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Best6668/AMIS --skill model-review-best6668

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill enables teams and judges to perform thorough, theory-to-practice evaluations of modeling proposals, simulating expert critique to tighten approaches before submission.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Expert reviewer simulation: multi-round analysis from a judging perspective, including scoring and actionable feedback.
  • Iterative improvement planning: converts feedback into concrete changes for problem-analysis, modeling approach, and validation steps.
  • Use Case: A student team submits a problem-analysis and initial modeling plan; the Skill conducts a rigorous review, flags gaps, and suggests improvements and further questions.

Quick Start

Submit your modeling proposal text and let the reviewer perform round-by-round critique, scoring, and improvement suggestions.

Frequently Asked Questions about model-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I get expert peer-review for my math modeling competition proposal?

To get expert peer-review for your math modeling competition proposal, submit your problem analysis and draft report text to this simulation tool for round-by-round scoring, gap flagging, and actionable improvement recommendations.

Can I use this math modeling critique tool to identify weaknesses in my draft report?

Yes, you can use this math modeling critique process to identify weaknesses in your draft report by applying structured prompts and clear scoring rubrics to rigorously analyze your initial modeling plan from a judging perspective.

What is the best way to simulate an expert judge for a math modeling plan?

The best way to simulate an expert judge for a math modeling plan is using a multi-round critical review workflow that applies clear scoring rubrics to evaluate problem analyses and outputs concrete iterative improvement changes.

Do I need Codex MCP workflow on Claude Code to perform a rigorous modeling proposal review?

Yes, you need access to the Codex MCP workflow on Claude Code and structured prompts to perform this rigorous modeling proposal review and generate round-by-round feedback and improvement questions.

What limitations should I expect when running a multi-round math modeling critique?

A limitation of running a multi-round math modeling critique is that the simulation requires structured prompts and clear scoring rubrics to function effectively, meaning unstructured or incomplete draft reports may yield less actionable feedback.