monthly-health-check

To detect documentation drift and maintain wiki quality, run a monthly audit that walks all wiki articles, correlates claims to raw source files, checks update recency, and flags contradictions, orphaned topics, and unsourced claims.

A wiki audit for content freshness and contradiction detection is a structured review process that correlates wiki articles against raw source coverage to catch compounding errors, flag stale content, and identify conflicting claims before new wiki use.

To find content gaps and unsourced claims in your knowledge base, run a health check that walks all wiki articles, flags missing citations from raw source files, and proposes new article targets based on raw sources not yet synthesized into the wiki.

Yes, you can identify orphaned topics and stale articles during knowledge base maintenance by running a scheduled audit that walks all wiki articles, checks update recency against new raw data, and finds topics mentioned but never explained elsewhere.

The best way to prevent wiki drift before new wiki use is to apply a monthly audit that catches compounding errors by correlating claims to raw source files, checking update recency, and writing a structured report with contradictions and recommendations.

Yes, you need raw source files to run a contradiction scan across wiki articles because the audit correlates claims to raw source coverage, flags missing citations, and recommends recompilation when content is outdated relative to new raw data.