msx:review-plan

To review a technical plan from multiple perspectives, you need a multi-expert analysis covering architecture, security, performance, technical depth, and risk. This approach evaluates your plan comprehensively to identify potential gaps and ensure code compliance before development begins.

Technical plan risk assessment is the process of evaluating a project plan to detect potential risks and issues from expert viewpoints. You need it before implementation to catch architectural or security flaws early, improving overall plan quality and project management outcomes.

Checking code compliance involves validating your technical plan against constitution and config files. This ensures the planned implementation adheres to predefined constitutional standards, integrating seamlessly into quality assurance workflows to prevent deviations.

Yes, technical plan analysis requires context from spec and plan files to evaluate the proposed changes. Access to constitution and config files is also necessary to perform accurate code compliance checks during the review process.

The best way to integrate plan review into technical project management is using predefined commands within your existing workflow. This allows automated multi-expert analysis of active changes, detecting risks and ensuring compliance without disrupting development processes.

Automated technical plan review is limited by the context provided in your spec and config files; without comprehensive input data, the multi-expert analysis cannot accurately assess architecture, security, performance, or risk perspectives for your project.