mt-review-cursor-config

To review Cursor configuration files, evaluate definitions against separation guidelines and recommended structures. This process identifies design issues, misplaced responsibilities, and quality problems to keep configuration systems consistent and maintainable.

You can audit Cursor Rule, Skill, SubAgent, and Hook definitions for structural issues. The review process applies guideline-based classification and checklist validation to assess definition types, scopes, duplication, clarity, and completeness.

Checking for misplaced responsibilities involves analyzing Cursor definitions against separation guidelines. The review workflow evaluates definition scopes and clarity to pinpoint quality problems and generate structured findings for improvement.

The best way to audit a Cursor configuration directory is applying checklist validation across all Rule, Skill, SubAgent, and Hook files. This generates structured review output that highlights duplication, efficiency gaps, and completeness issues.

Cursor configuration review requires no external dependencies or components. The workflow operates directly on configuration definitions, applying guideline-based classification to deliver structured findings and improvement suggestions.

You should run a configuration quality assessment when newly creating a Cursor Skill or modifying definition files. This prevents maintainability degradation by catching design issues, scope overlaps, and clarity problems early.