multi-layer-review

To run parallel blind reviews on a design spec, you provide the document and project context, select up to five independent reviewer roles, and the system automatically synthesizes their non-shared findings into a structured report.

Blind parallel review is a process where up to five independent reviewers critique a software architecture spec simultaneously without sharing findings, reducing bias and surfacing gaps before implementation begins.

You evaluate a technical specification for robustness by orchestrating independent reviewer roles, such as devil's advocate and robustness checks, to ground critiques in actual project state and auto-synthesize severity-based findings.

Yes, you can use multiple reviewer roles to check requirements and project plans, applying orchestrated critiques across architecture, code, user perspective, robustness, and goals to ensure traceable, structured output.

The best way to synthesize feedback from independent design spec critiques is to run blind reviews in parallel and use an automated synthesis step to merge findings into a severity-based, traceable report anchored to spec sections.

Yes, you need existing project context to review a technical design document, as the review process grounds its findings in the actual project state to ensure critiques are relevant to the current codebase and architecture.