multi-perspective-decision-wheel

What problem does it solve?

It helps groups avoid shallow or one-sided decisions by structuring how different perspectives reveal tensions, tradeoffs, and needed improvements before committing to action.

Core Features & Use Cases

• Perspective-based synthesis: Turns stakeholder, discipline, values, and time-horizon inputs into a structured set of “sees, misses, asks, contributes” spokes around a central judgement.
• Tension identification: Names genuine disagreements without prematurely forcing consensus, making tradeoffs explicit.
• Actionable output: Produces proposal improvement guidance (keep/change/test/stop) and a single next responsible step with evidence or permission requirements.

Three Horizons

• Use Case: After running scoping, mapping, Three Horizons, and dilemma navigation, use this skill to synthesize insights into a wiser next step for a school or community design decision.

Quick Start

Use the multi-perspective-decision-wheel skill to produce a decision wheel for “Should we adopt proposal X for year Y?” including 4–6 perspectives, at least one named tension, and a next responsible step with evidence or permission needs.