multi-result-handling

To preserve multi-agent CLI outputs, surface the structured sections like verdict, findings, and next-steps exactly as produced. This maintains evidence boundaries and keeps file references intact without reordering or paraphrasing the original helper outputs.

Consolidating structured reports from coding assistants involves surfacing the canonical final report when present. You maintain the original verdicts and next steps from each CLI, ensuring evidence boundaries and explicit notes about inferences remain intact across all outputs.

Handling interleaved reasoning streams requires presenting the structured final section clearly. You can optionally quote short reasoning lines if helpful, while ensuring the canonical final report and its evidence boundaries remain the primary focus without paraphrasing.

Yes, you can document verifications performed by coding assistants by reporting any edits, commands run, and touched files. This ensures the structured report maintains clear evidence boundaries and tracks all modifications made during the multi-agent output processing.

Multi-agent outputs lose evidence boundaries and file references when outputs are paraphrased or reordered during consolidation. To prevent this, preserve the canonical sections exactly as produced and cite any inferences, uncertainties, or open questions explicitly.

Multi-result-handling works across any multi-agent CLI tool that produces structured sections like verdict, findings, and next-steps. It applies universally to outputs from Cursor, Gemini, Copilot, Codex, and other assistants without altering the original evidence boundaries.