multi-review

Coordinate parallel LLM code reviews and compare cross-tool agreements.

1|Updated Mar 11, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/mataanin/multi-llm --skill multi-review-mataanin
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: multi-review
Source: https://github.com/mataanin/multi-llm/tree/main/skills/multi-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mataanin/multi-llm --skill multi-review-mataanin

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Align and consolidate feedback from multiple large language models to surface consensus, disagreements, and gaps in code-review coverage.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Parallel reviews: Run Claude, Codex, Gemini, Cursor in parallel to speed up feedback.
  • Cross-tool analysis: Compare results to identify agreements and divergences across tools.
  • Automation & reporting: Harvest bot reviews, aggregate analytics, and generate a unified report.

Quick Start

Invoke /review-cycle with your arguments to run all LLM reviews in parallel.

Frequently Asked Questions about multi-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run parallel multi-LLM code reviews to compare feedback from different tools?

To run parallel multi-LLM code reviews, orchestrate models like Claude, Codex, and Gemini simultaneously to harvest bot feedback, aggregate results, and identify cross-tool agreements or divergences.

What is cross-tool analysis in the context of automated code reviews?

Cross-tool analysis in automated code reviews involves comparing feedback from multiple large language models to surface consensus, disagreements, and gaps in code-review coverage across different platforms.

How do I consolidate bot feedback from multiple large language models into a unified report?

You can consolidate bot feedback by orchestrating parallel execution across multiple LLMs, harvesting their individual code review outputs, and aggregating the analytics into a single unified report.

Can I use parallel task execution for architecture validation across different LLMs?

Yes, you can use parallel task execution for architecture validation by running adjacent verification tasks simultaneously across multiple LLMs to compare their structural analysis and identify agreements.

What is the best way to orchestrate end-to-end review workflows using multiple code review bots?

The best way to orchestrate end-to-end review workflows is to coordinate parallel multi-LLM execution, harvest the resulting bot reviews, and aggregate the analytics to satisfy comprehensive reporting requirements.

Do I need specific dependencies to aggregate analytics from multi-LLM code reviews?

No specific dependencies are required to aggregate analytics from multi-LLM code reviews, as the orchestration process directly harvests bot feedback and generates unified reports without external module dependencies.