multiexpert-review

A panel of LLM evaluators coordinates multiple domain experts to review artifacts in parallel, surfacing diverse issues that a single reviewer might miss. It then synthesizes a transparent consensus verdict using the PoLL protocol.

To get a consensus verdict for a spec or test plan review, provide the artifact to the skill. It routes findings to appropriate expert profiles and agents, aggregates independent verdicts, and synthesizes structured issues with tracked deliberations.

Yes, you can use multiexpert review for project plans across different domains. The skill applies profile-aware verdicts and routes artifacts to independent agents, ensuring structured synthesis for diverse technical specifications.

The PoLL protocol is a mechanism for parallel artifact reviews where multiple independent LLM evaluators assess a document simultaneously. It structures the aggregation of expert verdicts to produce a transparent consensus.

Yes, the consensus review process provides optional receipts for project tracking. These receipts document the structured synthesis and verdict aggregation from the independent expert panel evaluations.

You should avoid using a multi-agent panel for artifact evaluation when a single domain expert is sufficient, as the overhead of orchestrating independent parallel reviews and synthesizing consensus is best suited for complex specs and plans requiring diverse perspectives.