mumo

Evaluate technical and product decisions through structured multi-model deliberations.

Updated Apr 22, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/mumo-chat/mumo-cursor --skill mumo
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: mumo
Source: https://github.com/mumo-chat/mumo-cursor/tree/main/skills/mumo
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mumo-chat/mumo-cursor --skill mumo

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill reduces the risk of making high-regret technical and product decisions by convening independent perspectives from multiple frontier AI models instead of relying on a single viewpoint.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-Model Deliberation: Run structured panels across Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok, Qwen, GLM, and Kimi.
  • Decision and Design Review: Evaluate architecture choices, implementation plans, APIs, migrations, launch readiness, security-sensitive changes, and contested strategies.
  • Structured Follow-Up: Interpret claim maps, apply moderator reactions, continue unresolved discussions, recover lost sessions, and synthesize actionable conclusions.
  • Use Case: Before implementing an authentication migration, use this Skill to pressure-test the design, uncover hidden failure modes, and compare competing approaches.

Quick Start

Ask the mumo skill to convene a multi-model panel to review your proposed architecture, plan, or high-stakes decision.

Frequently Asked Questions about mumo

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I use multi-model deliberation for architecture review?

You can pressure-test design choices by running structured multi-model deliberations that apply moderator reactions, generate claim maps, and synthesize actionable conclusions from independent AI perspectives.

What is the best way to pressure-test a pre-launch security migration plan?

The best way to pressure-test a security migration is to convene a multi-model panel for adversarial analysis, red teaming, and structured synthesis to uncover hidden failure modes before implementation.

Do I need an MCP server to run multi-model panels?

Yes, you need a connected mumo MCP server to run multi-model panels across Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok, Qwen, GLM, and Kimi for structured decision analysis and follow-up rounds.

Can I recover an interrupted multi-model design review session?

Yes, you can recover lost sessions and continue unresolved discussions through structured follow-up rounds that interpret claim maps and apply moderator reactions to reach actionable conclusions.

When should I not use multi-model deliberation for technical decisions?

Multi-model deliberation is not suited for low-stakes or routine technical decisions, as the overhead of convening independent model panels and synthesizing claim maps is designed specifically for high-regret scenarios like migrations and security-sensitive changes.