musmem-mislabeled-divisions

Detect duplicate placements across bodybuilding contest divisions and flag mislabeled results.

Updated Mar 1, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/timfogarty1549/musmemSkills --skill musmem-mislabeled-divisions
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: musmem-mislabeled-divisions
Source: https://github.com/timfogarty1549/musmemSkills/tree/main/musmem-mislabeled-divisions
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/timfogarty1549/musmemSkills --skill musmem-mislabeled-divisions

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Identify mislabeled placements in bodybuilding contest data by detecting duplicate placements across divisions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Flag divisions where the same placement appears more than once and the next placement exists, indicating potential mislabeling.
  • Process male/female files separately and across main and prelim datasets to avoid cross-gender comparisons.
  • Provide severity levels (HIGH/MED/LOW) and a report with athlete names and source files for manual review.

Quick Start

Run the mislabel detection script to scan all contest files and report flagged divisions.

Frequently Asked Questions about musmem-mislabeled-divisions

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I detect duplicate placements in bodybuilding contest data?

Duplicate placements in bodybuilding contest data are detected by scanning files grouped by year, contest, and division. The script flags divisions where a placement appears more than once and the next sequential placement also exists, outputting structured results with athlete names and source files.

How does mislabeled division detection work for male and female bodybuilding datasets?

Mislabeled division detection processes male and female bodybuilding files separately across main and prelim datasets to avoid cross-gender comparisons. It groups records by year, contest, and division, then flags suspicious duplicate placements within those isolated file groupings.

What's the best way to scan contest results for data quality issues?

The best way to scan contest results for data quality issues is using a script that categorizes flagged divisions into HIGH, MED, and LOW severity levels based on the number of suspicious placements. It excludes placements of 90 or higher and outputs a structured report.

Why does my bodybuilding contest data show duplicate placements across divisions?

Duplicate placements across divisions in bodybuilding contest data indicate potential mislabeling. The detection script flags instances where a placement appears more than once and the subsequent sequential placement also exists, excluding placement values of 90 or higher.

Are there limitations when scanning bodybuilding contest files for mislabeled divisions?

Limitations when scanning bodybuilding contest files for mislabeled divisions include the exclusion of placements valued at 90 or higher. The script requires distinct per-file groupings for male/female and prelim/main datasets to accurately flag suspicious duplicate placements without cross-gender comparisons.