muxing-style-review

Review academic writing by checking prose against a 21-rule style contract that evaluates reader clarity, evidence discipline, and style compliance. The review combines automatic detector evidence with manual judgment to produce actionable findings for Markdown and LaTeX drafts.

Yes, A/B draft comparison evaluates two drafts and highlights which version is stronger on severity, clarity, and evidence. This helps you choose the most readable and rigorous technical or academic prose for final publication.

Style analysis works with Markdown, plain text, and LaTeX excerpts. The review applies its 21-rule style contract to these formats to identify clarity issues and evidence discipline problems in technical and academic writing workflows.

Request a complete prose review to get actionable revision guidance. The review produces severity-ranked findings and revision briefs that guide downstream writing agents or human editors in fixing clarity and style issues.

Yes, a compact review mode provides a shorter ruleset when you explicitly request a compact-rule check. This delivers a faster style analysis focused on the most critical clarity and evidence discipline issues in your Markdown prose.

A complete technical writing style review requires bundled rule references and optional agent-style detector evidence. You provide Markdown, plain text, or LaTeX excerpts, and the review checks them against the 21-rule style contract for clarity and compliance.