mvt-fix

Diagnose software bugs and apply targeted code fixes with regression impact notes.

19|Updated Feb 12, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/uoyoCsharp/My-Virtual-TechTeam --skill mvt-fix
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: mvt-fix
Source: https://github.com/uoyoCsharp/My-Virtual-TechTeam/tree/main/.claude/skills/mvt-fix
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/uoyoCsharp/My-Virtual-TechTeam --skill mvt-fix

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps you move from a bug report or review finding to a validated code fix without wandering into unrelated analysis or redesign work. It is built for diagnosing issues, narrowing down root causes, planning the safest patch, and applying targeted fixes with clear guardrails.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured bug diagnosis: Reproduces issues when possible, localizes likely fault areas, generates hypotheses, and verifies the most likely root cause before changing code.
  • Multiple fix entry points: Works from direct user bug reports, prior bug-detection results, or review artifacts that already contain actionable findings.
  • Risk-aware patching: Classifies fixes by scope, asks for confirmation when changes are riskier, and escalates architectural problems instead of forcing unsafe edits.
  • Use case: When a user reports a runtime error, or a code review identifies warning-level defects, this Skill traces the issue to the source, proposes the smallest viable correction, applies it when appropriate, and summarizes regression risk and follow-up work.

Quick Start

Ask the AI to use the mvt-fix skill to diagnose a reported bug, confirm the root cause, and apply the smallest safe fix.

Frequently Asked Questions about mvt-fix

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I find the root cause of a software bug before applying a code fix?

Root cause analysis for software bugs involves reproducing the issue, localizing likely fault areas, generating hypotheses, and verifying the most likely cause before changing code. This ensures the smallest viable correction is applied safely.

What is the best way to fix code review findings and defects without introducing regressions?

Fixing code review findings requires classifying fix scope, applying targeted code repairs, and documenting regression impact. Risk-aware patching asks for confirmation on risky changes and escalates architectural problems instead of forcing unsafe edits.

How do I apply scoped patches for multi-module code changes safely?

Scoped patching for multi-module code changes requires diagnosing the issue, planning the safest patch, and applying targeted fixes with clear guardrails. It classifies fixes by scope and requests confirmation when changes carry higher risk.

Can I use automated bug fixing for single-file runtime errors?

Automated bug fixing for single-file runtime errors works by tracing the issue to the source, proposing the smallest viable correction, applying it when appropriate, and summarizing regression risk and follow-up work.

When should I avoid applying a targeted code fix myself?

You should avoid applying a targeted code fix when the issue stems from deeper architectural problems. In these cases, the correct approach is to escalate the problem rather than force unsafe edits that might introduce new regressions.