nano-mode

Replace the eight-phase SDD pipeline with a four-step inline workflow.

Updated Mar 15, 2026

Search Tags:#planning #build #review #small-changes #inline-workflow #nano-mode

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/JNZader/javi-ai --skill nano-mode

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: nano-mode
Source: https://github.com/JNZader/javi-ai/tree/main/own/skills/nano-mode
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/JNZader/javi-ai --skill nano-mode

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

SDD-lite for small changes. Quick, inline decision-making replaces the full SDD pipeline for minor updates.

Core Features & Use Cases

Replaces the eight-phase SDD with four fast steps: Challenge, Plan, Build, Review.
Ideal for single-file edits, bug fixes with clear scope, and small refactors under 100 LOC.
Enables consistent, audit-friendly change workflows without sub-agents.

Quick Start

Describe the tiny change you want to make and let Nano Mode guide the four-step inline workflow (Challenge, Plan, Build, Review).

Frequently Asked Questions about nano-mode

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I handle small code changes without running a full planning pipeline?▼

Small code changes can be handled using an inline four-step workflow that replaces the full SDD pipeline. This approach uses Challenge, Plan, Build, and Review phases to guide single-file edits and quick fixes while enforcing scope control.

What is the best way to plan a single-file edit or lightweight config tweak?▼

The best way to plan a single-file edit is using a four-step inline workflow that provides structured steps and documented outputs. It enables rapid validation for lightweight config tweaks without requiring sub-agents or the full eight-phase SDD process.

Can I use an inline workflow for bug fixes with clear scope?▼

Yes, an inline workflow is ideal for bug fixes with clear scope and small refactors under 100 LOC. It provides consistent, audit-friendly change handling through four fast steps: Challenge, Plan, Build, and Review.

When should I use a four-step inline workflow instead of the full SDD pipeline?▼

You should use a four-step inline workflow instead of the full SDD pipeline when dealing with minor updates, single-file edits, or quick fixes. It replaces the eight-phase SDD with fast inline decision-making where rapid validation matters.

Does the inline SDD-lite workflow support small refactors under 100 LOC?▼

Yes, the inline SDD-lite workflow supports small refactors under 100 LOC. It performs inline four-step handling with structured steps and documented outputs, ensuring consistent and audit-friendly workflows for minor updates.