nanobrain-testing-debugging

Diagnose nanobrain framework failures and verify integration tests against policy-checker scripts.

3|Updated Apr 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/AlexandrNP/apecx-mcp-integration --skill nanobrain-testing-debugging
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: nanobrain-testing-debugging
Source: https://github.com/AlexandrNP/apecx-mcp-integration/tree/main/.claude/skills/nanobrain-testing-debugging
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/AlexandrNP/apecx-mcp-integration --skill nanobrain-testing-debugging

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires pytest, asyncio, and includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This skill resolves the friction between the nanobrain framework's strict architectural requirements and the need for reliable, non-mocked integration testing.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Testing Strategy: Provides a clear taxonomy for smoke, integration, and unit tests to ensure components are verified against real backends without relying on misleading mocks.
  • Error Diagnosis: Offers a comprehensive guide to debugging common framework failure modes, including environment misconfigurations, trigger silent-failures, and Parsl worker issues.
  • Use Case: When a workflow step fails to execute or a test suite reports import errors, use this skill to identify the root cause—whether it is a missing async definition, a misconfigured trigger, or an incorrect Python interpreter.

Quick Start

Use the nanobrain-testing-debugging skill to diagnose why a workflow step is failing to trigger or to verify your integration test setup against the framework policy.

Frequently Asked Questions about nanobrain-testing-debugging

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I debug a nanobrain workflow step that fails to trigger?

Debug a failing nanobrain workflow trigger by checking for trigger silent-failures and misconfigurations. Use the testing primitives and policy-checker scripts to identify root causes like missing async definitions or incorrect Python interpreter settings.

Why does my nanobrain test suite report environment import errors?

Nanobrain import errors typically stem from environment misconfigurations or incorrect Python interpreters. Diagnose these failures by validating your test setup against the framework's strict architectural policy using the provided policy-checker scripts.

How do I run integration tests for nanobrain components without using mocks?

Run non-mocked nanobrain integration tests by following the provided testing taxonomy that validates components against real backends. This approach uses pytest and asyncio to verify production-grade reliability without misleading mock data.

What is the best way to structure tests for the nanobrain framework?

Structure nanobrain tests using a clear taxonomy of smoke, integration, and unit tests. This methodology ensures components are verified against real backends and strict architectural policies, avoiding misleading mocks and identifying common failure modes.

Do I need pytest and asyncio to test nanobrain framework components?

Yes, pytest and asyncio are required dependencies for executing the nanobrain testing methodology. These frameworks support the asynchronous execution and policy validation needed to verify components against real backends.

How do I resolve initialization errors in nanobrain framework components?

Resolve nanobrain initialization errors by identifying missing async definitions or environment-specific import issues. The skill provides a comprehensive diagnostic guide to trace these common failure modes using policy-checker scripts.