nash-env

Classify real-world scenarios into Nobel game-theory environment models for simulation.

1|Updated May 29, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/chiangchenghsin-hash/n-nash --skill nash-env
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: nash-env
Source: https://github.com/chiangchenghsin-hash/n-nash/tree/main/nash-env
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/chiangchenghsin-hash/n-nash --skill nash-env

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Help users identify which existing Nobel game-theory environment best matches a described real-world situation, so they can run the correct simulations and equilibrium checks.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Problem-to-model classification: Recommends the most suitable game environment (e.g., Hawk-Dove, Repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma, Public Goods) after confirming key assumptions like goals, information structure, and time horizon.
  • Agent-team parallel reasoning: When the match is unclear or cross-domain, coordinates multiple subagents to compare candidate models and produce a scored comparison table.
  • Source-code guided environment understanding: Explains environment mechanics and points to the relevant environment implementation files so users can inspect how payoffs and equilibria are computed.
  • Memory-guided routing: Persists the user’s final model selection and routes the workflow to the simulation execution skill.

Quick Start

Ask the AI: "Given this scenario [describe participants, incentives, information, and whether interactions repeat], which Nobel game-theory model fits best, and what assumptions do you need from me?"

Frequently Asked Questions about nash-env

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I map a real-world scenario to a suitable game theory model for simulation?

To map a real-world scenario to a game theory model, classify the participants, incentives, and information structure to identify the matching Nobel game-theory environment for equilibrium simulation. This process confirms key assumptions to recommend the best fit.

What is the best way to choose between multiple game-theory environments for a cross-domain problem?

The best way to choose between game-theory environments for a cross-domain problem is using agent-team parallel reasoning. This coordinates multiple subagents to compare candidate models and generate a scored comparison table for accurate model discovery.

How do I identify which Nobel game-theory environment fits my multi-agent reasoning problem?

To identify the fitting Nobel game-theory environment for a multi-agent reasoning problem, describe your scenario's participants, goals, information, and time horizon. A decision tree confirms assumptions to classify the correct model, such as Hawk-Dove or Public Goods.

Can I inspect how payoffs and equilibria are computed in a mapped environment model?

Yes, you can inspect how payoffs and equilibria are computed through source-code guided environment understanding. This feature explains environment mechanics and points to the relevant environment implementation files for direct review.

Does the model classification process persist my final game-theory selection for later use?

Yes, the model classification process uses memory-guided routing to persist your final game-theory selection. This memory saves the chosen environment and seamlessly routes the workflow to the simulation execution skill.

When should I not use automated environment mapping for game theory simulations?

You should not use automated environment mapping if your real-world scenario lacks clearly defined participants, goals, or information structures. Accurate equilibrium simulation requires confirming these key assumptions through the decision tree before proceeding.