What problem does it solve?
Manuscripts submitted to Nature and other high-impact journals are frequently challenged by reviewers over unclear sample sizes, pseudoreplication, undefined error bars, and significance-only language. This Skill audits, rewrites, or drafts statistical reporting text so that Methods, Results, and figure legends are transparent, reproducible, and aligned with the actual study design.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Statistical Reporting Audit: Reviews Statistical analysis sections, Results paragraphs, and figure legends against Nature Portfolio reporting standards, flagging issues with P0/P1/P2 severity labels.
- Replication and Design Checks: Distinguishes biological replicates, technical replicates, repeated measures, and independent experimental units to detect pseudoreplication and multiple-comparison risks.
- Journal-Specific Checklists: Applies flagship Nature Article requirements (exact n, test tails, F/t statistics with degrees of freedom) and Nature Machine Intelligence legend and source-data rules.
- Use Case: A reviewer comments that your statistics are insufficient. Paste the reviewer comment and your Methods section, and receive a point-by-point response draft, a revised Statistical analysis paragraph, and an AUTHOR_INPUT_NEEDED list of missing facts.
Quick Start
Ask the assistant to check whether your Statistical analysis paragraph and figure legends meet Nature statistical reporting requirements, pasting your manuscript text and noting the target journal.