negative-knowledge-pack

Package failed approaches and incidents into evidence-linked guidance.

Updated Jun 1, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/aurora-atoms/lattice --skill negative-knowledge-pack
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: negative-knowledge-pack
Source: https://github.com/aurora-atoms/lattice/tree/main/skills/negative-knowledge-pack
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/aurora-atoms/lattice --skill negative-knowledge-pack

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill prevents the repetition of costly mistakes by formalizing failed approaches and incidents into structured, evidence-backed guidance that teams can review and apply to future tasks.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Evidence-Based Avoidance: Links specific avoid rules to documented outcomes, incidents, or rejected designs to ensure prohibitions are grounded in reality.
  • Contextual Scoping: Records version, environment, and expiry triggers to prevent stale constraints from blocking valid experimentation.
  • Use Case: During an architecture review, use this Skill to package lessons from a previous failed deployment, ensuring the team avoids the same configuration traps while maintaining a path for safer alternatives.

Quick Start

Use the negative-knowledge-pack skill to analyze the provided incident report and generate a structured avoidance pack for the current project scope.

Frequently Asked Questions about negative-knowledge-pack

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I formalize incident learning to prevent repeated architecture failures?

Negative knowledge management captures failed approaches and incidents into structured, evidence-backed guidance. This prevents repeated errors during architecture reviews and project planning by formalizing prohibitions grounded in documented outcomes.

How do I create actionable guardrails from past project failures and incidents?

Actionable guardrails are created by linking specific avoid rules to documented outcomes and incidents. This structures failure evidence into versioned knowledge packs that prevent repeated errors during project planning and architecture reviews.

How do I record version and environment context for risk mitigation rules?

Risk mitigation rules are recorded with version, environment, and expiry triggers through contextual scoping. This prevents stale constraints from blocking valid experimentation and ensures prohibitions remain grounded in documented incident evidence.

What is the best way to document rejected designs for evidence-based avoidance?

The best way to document rejected designs is by formalizing them into structured knowledge packs that link specific avoid rules to documented outcomes. This ensures prohibitions are grounded in reality and preserves paths for safer alternatives.

How do I generate an avoidance pack from an incident report for architecture review?

An avoidance pack is generated by analyzing an incident report to produce structured, evidence-backed guidance. This requires structured input of bounded tasks and failure evidence to output versioned, actionable knowledge packs for the current project scope.

When should I not use formalized negative knowledge constraints in project planning?

Formalized negative knowledge constraints should not be used without contextual scoping records like version, environment, and expiry triggers. Without these, stale constraints risk blocking valid experimentation and safer alternative deployment paths.