nerdev-abstraction

Implements interface-first, registry, factory, and plugin patterns for plug-and-play TypeScript architectures.

1|Updated Aug 17, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/NalinDalal/skillset --skill nerdev-abstraction-nalindalal
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: nerdev-abstraction
Source: https://github.com/NalinDalal/skillset/tree/main/skills/nerdev/nerdev-abstraction
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/NalinDalal/skillset --skill nerdev-abstraction-nalindalal

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires zod.

What problem does it solve? Codebases grow tangled when features import each other directly, hardcode configuration, and mix business logic with transport layers. This Skill enforces plug-and-play abstraction patterns so components stay decoupled, swappable, and testable. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Interface-First Contracts: Define Tool, Service, Repository, and Plugin interfaces before any implementation, with a central registry as the single source of truth. - Factory & Plugin Protocol: Instantiate registered implementations with runtime configuration and load feature packages through a standardized plugin entry point. - Config-Driven Behavior: Control features, limits, and integrations through Zod-validated schemas and environment variables instead of code changes. - Use Case: When adding a new tool to a canvas editor, define its interface in packages/core, implement it in its own package, register it via the plugin entry point, and resolve it through the factory—no edits to existing features. ## Quick Start Ask the agent to refactor this feature into the interface-first registry and factory pattern from the nerdev-abstraction skill.

Frequently Asked Questions about nerdev-abstraction

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I implement a plugin architecture in TypeScript?▼

Define a Plugin interface with metadata, tools, services, hooks, and a configure method, then register implementations in a central registry. Feature packages export this standard shape and are instantiated through a factory with runtime configuration.

What is the registry pattern and when should I use it?▼

The registry pattern keeps a single Map of all implementations keyed by id, acting as the source of truth for composition. Use it when features must be added or removed without editing existing code, replacing switch statements with polymorphism.

How do I separate business logic from HTTP handlers?▼

Define domain service interfaces with pure TypeScript signatures and inject Repository and UnitOfWork abstractions instead of using Prisma or framework code directly. Transport layers like HTTP, WebSocket, or CLI only call these services.

Does this pattern work in a Turborepo monorepo?▼

Yes, it composes with the nerdev-monorepo skill: packages/core holds interfaces, registry, and factory, while apps consume them via barrel exports. Feature packages depend only on core and shared to avoid circular dependencies.

How do I migrate existing code to interface-first design?▼

Extract interfaces from concrete implementations, create a registry and register existing code, then replace direct imports with factory calls. Finally move shared utilities to packages/shared, add a Zod config schema, and introduce an event bus for cross-feature communication.

When should I avoid the factory and registry pattern?▼

Avoid it for small single-purpose scripts where indirection adds overhead without benefit. The pattern pays off when multiple pluggable implementations exist or when features must be toggled through configuration rather than code changes.