nestjs-code-review

NestJS code review involves analyzing controllers, services, modules, guards, and interceptors against best practices. This process evaluates dependency injection and database patterns, enforcing SOLID principles and TypeScript conventions to identify production-readiness gaps during PR validations.

Common architectural issues in NestJS controllers and services include improper dependency injection, bypassed guards, and inefficient database integration patterns. Identifying these violations ensures adherence to SOLID principles and TypeScript conventions, preventing maintenance challenges and security gaps.

Yes, you can validate NestJS dependency injection patterns in a pull request using this Skill. It evaluates DI patterns alongside pipes, interceptors, and database integration to enforce best practices, generating a prioritized report with severity levels and concrete code examples.

The best way to enforce SOLID principles and TypeScript conventions in a NestJS codebase is through structured code reviews. This Skill analyzes architectural components like modules and services, categorizing findings into Critical, Warning, and Suggestion levels with actionable code examples.

To generate a structured report for NestJS code review findings, run an analysis on changed files. The Skill outputs a prioritized report categorizing architectural and quality issues as Critical, Warning, or Suggestion, complete with concrete code examples to guide refactoring.

Yes, this NestJS code review process supports feature refactors and architecture validation. It evaluates guards, pipes, and interceptors against best practices to ensure structural consistency, making it suitable for routine PR validations and larger architectural refactoring efforts.