neutral-review

To resolve disagreements between plan-agent and analysis-agent, you can use a neutral arbitration skill that reads draft-plan.md, evaluates both agents' analyses, and writes a structured neutral opinion back into the document to guide decisions.

Independent arbitration in decision support is a risk-assessment mechanism that parses a draft plan, evaluates conflicting internal agent analyses, and produces a neutral, evidence-based opinion to guide final decisions.

You can add a third-party assessment by applying a neutral arbitration skill that reads draft-plan.md and appends a structured opinion using a required template, ensuring strict neutrality without modifying existing internal agent analyses.

Yes, you can use neutral arbitration specifically for internal agent disagreements in software engineering plans. The skill parses the draft plan, documents rationale and risks, and enforces strict neutrality to guide your decision-support workflow.

The limitation of independent arbitration is that it strictly does not modify existing analyses in the draft plan. It only reads the document and appends a neutral opinion, meaning it cannot overwrite or alter prior agent outputs.

You need a neutral arbitration opinion in your decision-support workflow when there is a disagreement between plan-agent and analysis-agent, or when a user explicitly requests a third-party assessment to evaluate risks and document rationale.