Create technical RFCs with research-gated drafting and adversarial review.
npx skills add https://github.com/phanijapps/engram --skill new-rfc-phanijapps
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: new-rfc Source: https://github.com/phanijapps/engram/tree/main/.claude/skills/new-rfc Command: npx skills add https://github.com/phanijapps/engram --skill new-rfc-phanijapps
This skill solves the problem of poorly researched, un-steerable, and un-auditable technical proposals by enforcing a rigorous, answer-first drafting process that mandates research and adversarial review before any code is written.
Invoke the new-rfc skill to draft a proposal for the new authentication architecture by providing the core problem statement to the agent.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To draft a technical RFC, use a research-gated workflow that generates structured proposal scaffolding with mandatory sections like Reviewer Briefs, enforces prior art verification, and runs pre-handoff quality gates for adversarial review and citation integrity.
A research-gated workflow for architectural proposals mandates independent verification of subpoints against repository and external prior art before drafting, ensuring high-stakes technical decisions are auditable and consensus-ready before any code is written.
You need MECE option analysis and citation-integrity checks for technical design when proposing cross-package architectural changes or governance updates that require team consensus and verifiable prior art to prevent hallucinated facts or untested assumptions.
Yes, you can use this RFC drafting process for cross-package architectural changes and governance updates, as it applies specifically to high-stakes technical decisions requiring rigorous, answer-first drafting and team consensus.
Yes, the RFC proposal generation requires Python3 as a dependency to execute its scripts and assets that facilitate the structured proposal scaffolding and research-gated drafting workflow.
The best way to prevent hallucinated facts in technical proposals is to enforce pre-handoff quality gates that mandate adversarial review and citation-integrity checks against verifiable prior art before approving the RFC.
lemieuxGuide one-at-a-time dialogue to define problems and generate structured ideation notes for RFC drafting.
ActiveInferenceInstituteModel organizational structures and governance frameworks for geospatial initiatives.
Meir017Generate self-contained HTML diagrams of . .NET codebase architecture and dependencies.
JacksonZx535Audit prompt engineering systems for governance and compliance.
