niwashi-05-review

Review narrative visualizations by running a two-pass evaluation that validates content accuracy against the narrative-spec, followed by implementation and visual coherence checks to ensure readiness for human handoff.

A two-pass narrative quality review evaluates content accuracy and flow first, then assesses implementation, performance, accessibility, and visual coherence. It is needed after all narrative sections pass the build phase.

Validate narrative flow and clarity by evaluating completed visualizations against the narrative-spec and narrative-brief, generating structured findings to guide necessary fixes before final handoff.

Yes, automated review processes can prepare narrative documentation for handoff by enforcing process governance, updating progress records, and generating structured findings to route the workflow upon approval.

The best way to track progress and route a completed build is to apply a structured review that enforces process governance, updates progress records, and automatically routes the narrative stack to the harvest phase upon approval.

Narrative documentation needs a quality review after building visualizations to ensure content accuracy, enforce process governance, verify accessibility, and confirm that the implementation is coherent enough for human handoff.