no-ai-slop

Edit drafts for clearer natural writing while preserving the author's voice.

Updated Jul 3, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/alex-jordan547/agent-setup --skill no-ai-slop-alex-jordan547
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: no-ai-slop
Source: https://github.com/alex-jordan547/agent-setup/tree/main/skills/no-ai-slop
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/alex-jordan547/agent-setup --skill no-ai-slop-alex-jordan547

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Drafts often contain formulaic filler, repetition, and grand claims that weaken the writing, but heavy-handed editing can flatten the author's voice and strip out personality. This Skill makes the smallest effective edit that improves clarity while preserving meaning, facts, humor, and rhythm. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Voice-preserving editing: Revises a supplied draft for its intended audience, cutting setup, repetition, and unsupported claims without inventing evidence or imposing a uniform style. - Formulaic passage detection: Quotes formulaic passages and suggests concrete corrections without rewriting the draft or claiming to identify AI authorship. - Edit evaluation checklist: Uses eval.md to compare the revision against the original, checking that meaning, facts, and voice survived the edit. - Use Case: Paste a blog post draft that feels generic and ask for an edit; receive a tightened version with brief explanations of substantial changes, plus flagged unsupported claims. ## Quick Start Edit this draft to remove filler and formulaic phrasing while keeping my voice, and briefly explain the substantial changes.

Frequently Asked Questions about no-ai-slop

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I edit a draft without losing the author's voice?

Make the smallest effective edit: preserve meaning, facts, uncertainty, vocabulary, humor, and rhythm while cutting only setup, repetition, and claims that add nothing. Avoid banning specific words or polishing every paragraph to the same level.

How to detect formulaic or AI-sounding writing in a draft?

Quote the formulaic passage and suggest a concrete correction, such as replacing generic importance with a concrete consequence already supported by the draft. Do not rewrite the whole draft or claim to identify AI authorship.

What kinds of cuts improve a draft the most?

Remove dramatic endings that only repeat the point, name the source behind vague attributions, and replace generic importance statements with concrete consequences. Flag unsupported claims rather than inventing evidence for them.

When should I not use heavy editing on a draft?

Avoid heavy editing when it would strip useful detail, personality, or the author's recognizable voice. Changes to structure or tone should be proportional to the requested edit, and cuts should target actual filler rather than stylistic quirks.

How do I verify an edit preserved the original meaning?

Compare the revision against the original using the eval checklist: confirm facts, uncertainty, and voice survived, no claims or quotes were added without support, and the text reads naturally without a uniform imposed rhythm.