no-direct-main

Enforces a no-direct-main policy by routing all changes through pull requests and peer review.

1|Updated Mar 7, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/jimmymalhan/codereview-pilot --skill no-direct-main
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: no-direct-main
Source: https://github.com/jimmymalhan/codereview-pilot/tree/main/.claude/skills/no-direct-main
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jimmymalhan/codereview-pilot --skill no-direct-main

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill prevents direct commits to the main branch, ensuring all code changes, whether for operational tasks or product features, undergo peer review via Pull Requests (PRs).

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Mandatory PRs: Enforces a strict policy where no code bypasses the PR process.
  • Peer Review: Requires consensus from peers (agents, reviewers, stakeholders) before merging.
  • Use Case: A developer needs to update a CI script. Instead of committing directly to main, they create a feature branch, push their changes, and open a PR, which is then reviewed and approved before merging.

Quick Start

Ensure all new code contributions are submitted through a pull request for review.

Frequently Asked Questions about no-direct-main

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I prevent direct commits to the main branch in git?

To prevent direct commits to the main branch, enforce a strict policy requiring all code changes to go through a peer review process via Pull Requests. This ensures no operational or product updates bypass consensus before merging.

What is the best way to enforce a pull request workflow for operational tasks?

The best way to enforce a pull request workflow for operational tasks is to mandate that all changes, including CI script updates, are pushed to a feature branch and opened as a PR for peer review and approval before merging.

How does a mandatory peer review process work for main branch updates?

A mandatory peer review process for main branch updates requires developers to create a branch, commit changes, push them, and open a Pull Request. Peers must then review and reach consensus before the code is merged into main.

Can I require consensus from stakeholders before merging a pull request?

Yes, you can require consensus from stakeholders, agents, and reviewers before merging a pull request. This strict policy mandates that all code changes undergo peer review to ensure quality and agreement prior to merging.

When do I need to use a branching strategy instead of committing directly to main?

You need to use a branching strategy instead of committing directly to main whenever you have code changes for product features or operational tasks. This mandates creating a branch and opening a PR for peer review.