non-fiction-precision

Rebuild document structure to state conclusions first and remove fragmented arguments.

4|Updated Feb 20, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/JoelLewis/skill-library --skill non-fiction-precision
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: non-fiction-precision
Source: https://github.com/JoelLewis/skill-library/tree/main/plugins/rhetorician/skills/non-fiction-precision
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/JoelLewis/skill-library --skill non-fiction-precision

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It helps rewrite documents with clear structure, remove redundancy, and ensure conclusions are stated upfront.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Apply Minto's Pyramid Principle to present the conclusion first and group supporting arguments MECE-style.
  • Enforce concise prose per Strunk's rules, improving readability without sacrificing meaning.
  • Use cases: drafting memos, reports, PRDs, whitepapers, and executive briefings, where precise structure and persuasive clarity matter.

Quick Start

Submit a draft document and I will apply Minto's Pyramid Principle and Orwellian concision to rebuild its structure.

Frequently Asked Questions about non-fiction-precision

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I restructure a report to present conclusions upfront?

To restructure a report and present conclusions upfront, submit your draft to apply Minto's Pyramid Principle. It rebuilds document flow by stating the main conclusion first, grouping supporting arguments MECE-style to eliminate fragmented logic and unclear takeaways.

What is the best way to fix fragmented arguments in a whitepaper?

The best way to fix fragmented arguments in a whitepaper is applying MECE grouping to align supporting points. This ensures arguments are mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive, eliminating redundancy while solidifying the logical structure of your executive briefing.

How do I reduce wordiness in a PRD without losing technical meaning?

To reduce wordiness in a PRD without losing meaning, apply Strunk's prose rules and Orwellian concision. This enforces concise drafting by removing redundant phrasing and improving readability, ensuring technical arguments remain solid and precise.

Can I use this to rebuild structure for both memos and executive briefings?

Yes, you can use this to rebuild structure for memos, executive briefings, PRDs, and reports. It applies the Pyramid Principle to any draft document where logical flow, clear conclusions, and persuasive clarity matter.

Why does my document structure fail to communicate the main argument?

Your document structure fails to communicate the main argument when conclusions are buried and supporting points lack MECE alignment. Rebuilding the flow with Minto's Pyramid Principle fixes this by grouping arguments logically and stating conclusions upfront.