notebooklm-brief-verifier

Cross-checks NotebookLM briefs against source bundles for accuracy.

45|7|Updated Apr 6, 2026

Search Tags:#verification #audit #notebooklm #brief #contradictions #source-bundle #claim-attribution

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/WenyuChiou/research-hub --skill notebooklm-brief-verifier

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: notebooklm-brief-verifier
Source: https://github.com/WenyuChiou/research-hub/tree/main/skills/notebooklm-brief-verifier
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/WenyuChiou/research-hub --skill notebooklm-brief-verifier

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

NotebookLM briefs can misrepresent sources. This skill verifies a downloaded NotebookLM brief against the actual source bundle uploaded to research-hub and reports missed sources, unsupported claims, contradictions, and recommended follow-up prompts to improve trust before sharing or citing.

Core Features & Use Cases

Source-coverage check: matches claims to bundle sources, flags missing attributions.
Contradiction and overgeneralization detection: identifies cross-source conflicts and overgeneralized statements.
Follow-up prompts: suggests targeted NotebookLM prompts to close gaps and verify claims.

Quick Start

Submit a NotebookLM brief and its source list to generate a verification report that flags missed sources, unsupported claims, and contradictions.

Frequently Asked Questions about notebooklm-brief-verifier

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I verify a NotebookLM brief against my original source bundle?▼

Verifying a NotebookLM brief involves cross-checking its claims against the original source bundle to identify missing sources, misattributions, and cross-source contradictions. The verification process scans bundle manifests, Obsidian notes, and PDFs to produce a structured report with actionable prompts.

What is the best way to check for unsupported claims and misattributions in NotebookLM outputs?▼

Checking for unsupported claims requires a source-coverage scan that matches brief statements to bundle sources and flags missing attributions. This verification also detects cross-source contradictions and overgeneralized statements to ensure research reliability before sharing.

Can I audit a NotebookLM brief if my research sources include PDFs and Obsidian notes?▼

Yes, you can audit a NotebookLM brief using PDFs and Obsidian notes. The verification process operates across bundle manifests, Obsidian notes, and PDFs as available, performing source-coverage scanning, claim-attribution, and cross-source contradiction checks across these formats.

How do I identify cross-source contradictions and overgeneralizations in generated research briefs?▼

Identifying cross-source contradictions and overgeneralizations in research briefs involves running a verification check against the uploaded source bundle. This audit flags conflicting statements across multiple sources and highlights claims that overgeneralize the original data.

What follow-up prompts should I use to close gaps in a NotebookLM brief?▼

To close gaps in a NotebookLM brief, a verification report provides suggested targeted follow-up NotebookLM prompts. These prompts are generated based on spot-checks and identified missing sources, helping you verify claims and improve brief reliability before citing.