novelty-assessment

Assess research idea novelty through multi-round literature searches across Semantic Scholar and arXiv.

Updated Apr 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Embers-of-the-Fire/agent-research-skills-opencode --skill novelty-assessment-embers-of-the-fire
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: novelty-assessment
Source: https://github.com/Embers-of-the-Fire/agent-research-skills-opencode/tree/main/.opencode/skills/novelty-assessment
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Embers-of-the-Fire/agent-research-skills-opencode --skill novelty-assessment-embers-of-the-fire

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Rigorously assess whether a research idea is novel through systematic literature search.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated novelty checks via a defined multi-round search protocol.
  • Harsh critic persona applied to identify overlaps and gaps.
  • Structured JSON outputs that summarize decisions and identify most similar papers.

Quick Start

Provide a research idea description to start a multi-round novelty assessment.

Frequently Asked Questions about novelty-assessment

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I check the novelty of a research idea against existing literature?

To check research idea novelty, the Skill performs systematic multi-round searches across arXiv and Semantic Scholar, applying a harsh critic persona to identify overlaps and output a structured JSON decision with supporting papers.

How does automated literature search evaluate paper overlap for a new research proposal?

Automated literature search evaluates paper overlap by enforcing a minimum of three search rounds across databases, differentiating the proposed idea from existing work and returning a structured JSON decision identifying the most similar papers.

Can I use arXiv and Semantic Scholar to systematically critique my research concept?

Yes, you can use arXiv and Semantic Scholar to critique your research concept by executing a defined multi-round search protocol that rigorously assesses novelty and identifies gaps in the existing literature.

What is the best way to systematically assess research idea novelty before submission?

The best way to assess research idea novelty is using a multi-round search protocol that applies a harsh critic persona to literature checks, producing a structured JSON decision that highlights differentiation from existing work.

Does the novelty assessment process enforce a minimum number of literature search rounds?

Yes, the novelty assessment process enforces a minimum of three search rounds to rigorously evaluate overlap with existing work and ensure a structured JSON decision is supported by comprehensive literature checks.