novelty-check

A research novelty check verifies whether your proposed method has already been reported by extracting three core technical claims and searching recent arXiv literature for close prior work. It helps you avoid wasted effort before proceeding with implementation.

A literature review for prior art finds existing publications by running broad then focused web searches against recent arXiv papers to compare key technical claims. It identifies exactly three core claims from your idea to establish whether the method is defensible.

The best way to validate research novelty is to extract exactly three core technical claims from your idea and run a bounded set of targeted web searches against recent literature. This produces a structured markdown summary assessing overall novelty and identifying the closest prior work.

Yes, you can use a novelty check for academic writing by comparing your proposed research idea or method against recent arXiv literature. It extracts three core claims and runs bounded web searches to ensure your technical contributions are defensible before submission.

To run a novelty check, input your research idea or method description using the prompt format 查新 followed by your pasted text. The system will extract three core technical claims, execute targeted web searches, and write a novelty_check_report.md file with the assessment.

An automated idea validation search is limited to recent arXiv literature and a bounded set of web searches, meaning it may not capture non-arXiv publications or paywalled journals outside its search scope. It focuses strictly on comparing three extracted core technical claims to find the closest prior work.