nw-ad-critique-dimensions

To identify gaps in acceptance test quality, apply nine evaluation dimensions including happy path bias, GWT format, and traceability coverage to generate actionable remediation notes with prioritized issues and concrete rewrites.

The best way to reframe walking skeleton tests for user-centricity is to evaluate them against priority validation and boundary proof dimensions, flagging internal-state assertions and suggesting rewrites that emphasize observable user outcomes.

Review acceptance tests by checking GWT format and business language purity dimensions, ensuring tests avoid internal state assertions and establish clear traceability to user stories and environments for actionable improvements.

Yes, this acceptance test critique approach works for existing suites by reviewing provided skill content, applying coverage completeness and traceability dimensions, and publishing a structured report with recommended changes.

Fix happy path bias and boundary proof issues by applying the walking skeleton boundary proof evaluation dimension, which provides concrete remediation notes that prioritize user-centric outcomes over internal state validation.