nw-diverger-review-criteria

To evaluate diverge artifacts for JTBD rigor and research quality, apply a five-dimension rubric to files under docs/feature/{id}/diverge/ to produce a structured YAML report covering option diversity, taste application, and recommendation coherence.

An adversarial review of product management artifacts is a structured critique process that systematically checks Diverger outputs against defined criteria, ensuring rigorous evaluation and early issue detection before design decisions are finalized.

To validate SKILL.md frontmatter and generate a YAML review report, run an automated assessment on feature artifacts that verifies description sections exist and returns a comprehensive verdict with actionable issues per check.

Yes, you can use automated review criteria to check recommendation coherence in Diverger artifacts. The assessment applies a structured rubric to evaluate JTBD rigor, research quality, option diversity, and taste application.

Automated artifact evaluation for diverge files is limited to checking structural presence and rubric compliance within docs/feature/{id}/diverge/. It cannot assess subjective design quality beyond the defined taste application dimension criteria.

The Diverger artifact review requires no external dependencies. It operates autonomously to apply the five-dimension checklist to feature artifacts and output a structured YAML verdict with identified issues.