nw-formal-verification-tlaplus

Guide formal verification decisions for distributed systems with TLA+ patterns.

Updated Apr 15, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/StudentCristian/nWave-github --skill nw-formal-verification-tlaplus
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: nw-formal-verification-tlaplus
Source: https://github.com/StudentCristian/nWave-github/tree/main/.github/skills/nw-formal-verification-tlaplus
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/StudentCristian/nWave-github --skill nw-formal-verification-tlaplus

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Formal verification guidance for distributed systems, providing decision heuristics, key patterns, and strategies to determine when TLA+/PlusCal is beneficial over alternative methods.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Decision tree to assess when formal verification adds value for distributed or concurrent systems.
  • Pattern references for common protocols (leader election, consensus, 2PC, CRDTs) and strategies to manage state explosion.
  • Architecture-level comparison of formal methods with alternatives (PBT, Alloy, etc.) and practical ADR templates.

Quick Start

Begin by selecting a distributed protocol example and outline a concise TLA+ specification to model its safety properties.

Frequently Asked Questions about nw-formal-verification-tlaplus

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
When should I use TLA+ for formal verification of distributed systems?

Use TLA+ formal verification when modeling distributed systems like consensus or leader election protocols to prove safety properties. A decision tree helps determine if formal methods add value over alternative testing approaches.

How do I manage state explosion when model checking distributed protocols?

Manage state explosion during model checking by applying specific pattern references for distributed protocols. These strategies constrain the state space of TLA+ specifications to prevent memory exhaustion while validating critical safety properties.

How does TLA+ compare to property-based testing and Alloy for protocol verification?

TLA+ provides exhaustive model checking for distributed systems, whereas property-based testing and Alloy offer different verification scopes. Architecture-level comparisons evaluate formal methods against alternatives to determine the best approach for consensus and data replication.

Can I use TLA+ to verify multi-party coordination and CRDTs?

Yes, TLA+ supports verifying multi-party coordination and CRDTs by providing pattern references for these distributed protocols. You outline concise specifications to model safety properties and coordination logic.

How do I start writing a TLA+ specification for a consensus protocol?

Start writing a TLA+ specification by selecting a distributed protocol example and outlining a concise PlusCal or TLA+ model. Focus on defining the safety properties of the consensus protocol to evaluate its behavior through model checking.