nw-por-review-criteria

Standardize evaluation criteria for journey artifacts in product reviews.

Updated Mar 18, 2024
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/v1bh0r/precise-ledger-pro --skill nw-por-review-criteria-v1bh0r
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: nw-por-review-criteria
Source: https://github.com/v1bh0r/precise-ledger-pro/tree/main/nWave/skills/nw-por-review-criteria
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/v1bh0r/precise-ledger-pro --skill nw-por-review-criteria-v1bh0r

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Provides a structured rubric to evaluate journey artifact reviews, ensuring consistency across assessments and enabling clear, actionable feedback for product-management teams.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Journey Coherence: Validate complete flow with no gaps; checks include start-to-goal mapping, absence of orphan steps, no dead ends, and well-defined recovery paths.
  • Emotional Arc: Assess the narrative quality of artifacts, with defined start/middle/end, clear annotations, smooth transitions, and progressively built confidence.
  • Shared Artifact Tracking: Ensure all sources are documented, single source of truth, and clearly identify consumers and integration risks.
  • Example Data Quality: Promote realistic data points that reveal integration points, version alignment, and path consistency across steps.
  • CLI UX Patterns: Verify consistent command vocabulary, accessible help, error guidance, and progressive disclosure.
  • Four Bug Patterns: Version mismatch, hardcoded URLs, path inconsistencies, and missing commands with concrete detection guidelines.

Quick Start

Run a sample review of a journey artifact using the defined dimensions and bug-pattern checks to generate a structured assessment.

Frequently Asked Questions about nw-por-review-criteria

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I standardize journey artifact reviews for product management workflows?▼

A journey artifact review rubric validates complete flow with no gaps by checking start-to-goal mapping, identifying orphan steps, eliminating dead ends, and verifying well-defined recovery paths throughout the journey.

How do I assess emotional arc and narrative quality in product artifacts?▼

Track shared artifacts by ensuring all sources are documented, establishing a single source of truth, and clearly identifying consumers and integration risks across the product management workflow.

What is the best way to detect common bug patterns in journey artifacts?▼

Verify CLI UX patterns by checking for consistent command vocabulary, accessible help documentation, clear error guidance, and progressive disclosure of information throughout the interface.

How do I validate example data quality across product journey steps?▼

Review journey artifacts by evaluating shared artifact tracking, journey coherence, emotional arc, example data quality, CLI UX patterns, and four bug patterns to ensure comprehensive coverage.

Can I use a structured rubric to evaluate journey coherence and identify dead ends?▼

Apply severity levels within the review output schema to categorize identified issues, enabling clear and actionable feedback for product-management teams during artifact assessments.