nw-review-workflow

Evaluate agent definitions against the V2 validation checklist.

Updated Apr 15, 2026

Search Tags:#workflow #validation #safety #review #scoring #agent-definition #auditable

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/StudentCristian/nWave-github --skill nw-review-workflow

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: nw-review-workflow
Source: https://github.com/StudentCristian/nWave-github/tree/main/.github/skills/nw-review-workflow
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/StudentCristian/nWave-github --skill nw-review-workflow

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a structured, standards-based workflow for agent definition reviews, ensuring consistent evaluation, transparent scoring, and auditable outcomes.

Core Features & Use Cases

A detailed V2 validation checklist guiding frontmatter integrity, size, language, examples, and safety
A formal scoring methodology with per-dimension verdicts and clear evidence requirements
A structured peer review protocol and accompanying command-template guidance to streamline collaboration and approvals

Quick Start

Execute the nw-review-workflow on the target agent definition to perform a full dimension review and produce a structured YAML verdict

Frequently Asked Questions about nw-review-workflow

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I validate agent definition frontmatter and safety compliance?▼

Agent definition validation checks frontmatter integrity, size, wording, examples, safety, and delegation using a structured V2 validation checklist to ensure standardized scoring and auditable review outcomes.

What is a structured agent review workflow for reproducible approvals?▼

A structured agent review workflow applies a V2 validation checklist across multiple dimensions, enforcing frontmatter requirements and calm language to produce standardized per-dimension verdicts and reproducible approval outcomes.

How do I score agent definitions across multiple review dimensions?▼

Scoring agent definitions involves applying a formal methodology with per-dimension verdicts and clear evidence requirements, assessing frontmatter, size, language, examples, and safety to generate a structured YAML verdict.

Can I use a standardized checklist for peer review of agent definitions?▼

Yes, a formal peer review protocol with command-template guidance streamlines collaboration for agent definition reviews, applying a V2 validation checklist to ensure transparent scoring and auditable revision or approval outcomes.

Does the agent review workflow enforce calm language and frontmatter requirements?▼

Yes, the review workflow enforces frontmatter requirements and calm language during agent definition evaluations, ensuring standardized scoring and a reproducible verdict process for auditable approvals or revisions.

What are the limitations of using a structured scoring workflow for agent definitions?▼

The workflow is limited to evaluating agent definitions against a V2 validation checklist, requiring frontmatter integrity, standardized scoring, and calm language, meaning it cannot assess agents lacking defined structural components.