offensive-bug-identification

A structured vulnerability discovery methodology applies a phase-driven workflow to identify and classify software bugs, covering reconnaissance, static analysis, dynamic analysis, fuzzing, and exploitation planning to ensure disciplined triage across source, binary, and runtime contexts.

To identify and triage security bugs during a code audit, apply a structured bug-identification methodology that sequentially executes reconnaissance, static analysis, and dynamic analysis to classify vulnerabilities and establish clear triage rules for the findings.

Yes, you can use fuzzing and patch-diffing for bug bounty triage. The bug-identification workflow supports structured vulnerability research by applying these dynamic analysis techniques to evaluate and classify security issues across source, binary, and runtime environments.

The best way to run vulnerability research across source and binary contexts is using a disciplined, phase-driven workflow that integrates static analysis, reverse engineering, and dynamic analysis to systematically identify, classify, and triage software vulnerabilities.

This bug identification workflow requires understanding of security audit concepts like static analysis, fuzzing, and reverse engineering. It provides reference workflows and checklists to guide the vulnerability research process, but expects knowledge of code, binary, and runtime analysis contexts.