What problem does it solve?
Generic AI-generated safety paperwork is routinely rejected by regulators: it contains vague tasks, controls that default to personal protective equipment (PPE), unowned actions, root causes that stop at "worker error", and leaked personal or health data. This skill eliminates those failures by enforcing a structured, specificity-first intake, hierarchy of controls ranking, mandatory de-identification, and a strict no-fabrication rule for all quantitative data and barrier claims.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Structured Intake & Gap Tracking: Runs a one-at-a-time branched intake to capture named installation details, applicable regulatory regime, and all SI 2015/398 Schedule 6/7 safety case elements, flagging any unsupplied QRA, SCE performance standard, or barrier-effectiveness claim as [GAP] instead of inventing data.
- Regulator-Ready Argument Mapping: Assembles a goal-structured claim → argument → evidence map for UK and EU offshore oil and gas duty holders, cross-referencing the sibling marine-emergency-response plan for emergency response elements instead of rebuilding them.
- Built-In Compliance Guardrails: Enforces mandatory de-identification of personal and health data, hierarchy of controls ranking for all risk-reduction measures, and a pre-output subject matter expert (SME) review to ensure defensibility against regulator challenge.
- Use Case: An offshore installation manager needs to assemble a safety case argument for a fixed production platform under SI 2015/398. This skill elicits all required inputs, records their external QRA and SCE register data with full provenance, flags gaps, and produces a compliant, de-identified argument map ready for competent person review.
Quick Start
Use the offshore-safety-case skill to structure a compliant safety case argument for your named offshore installation under SI 2015/398, providing your HAZID, QRA, and SCE register inputs as the structured intake prompts.