oiticica-correctness

Review English prose for grammar, spelling, idiom, and punctuation failures.

10|Updated May 15, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/pasunboneleve/oiticica-style --skill oiticica-correctness
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: oiticica-correctness
Source: https://github.com/pasunboneleve/oiticica-style/tree/main/src/oiticica-correctness
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/pasunboneleve/oiticica-style --skill oiticica-correctness

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Correctness failures in English prose—grammar, spelling, idiom, punctuation, and other language tradition issues—can block clarity and make even good writing feel wrong.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Modern-English correctness enforcement: Applies standard English grammar, spelling, idiom, and punctuation while respecting cases where dialect or historical form is required.
  • Preserve boundary for quoted language: Keeps historical language intact when it is explicitly quoted, modernizing only surrounding instruction.
  • Objective, repeatable review workflow: Uses a Principle/Preserve/Rubric path for strong models and a Weak/Fault/Better/ Rubric path for repairs, with pass/fail checks to prevent vague judgments.
  • Does not cross linguistic systems: Avoids importing Portuguese grammar rules into English.

Quick Start

Use oiticica-correctness to review the paragraph below for correctness and return an objectively checked revision.

Frequently Asked Questions about oiticica-correctness

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I fix grammar and punctuation errors in my English prose?

Fixing grammar and punctuation in English prose requires a structured review that detects spelling, idiom, and register failures. Applying objective pass/fail checks ensures revisions remain accurate while preserving your intended meaning and voice.

What is the best way to review writing for correctness without changing my style?

Reviewing writing for correctness without altering style means separating language tradition checks from stylistic judgments. Focusing strictly on grammar, spelling, and punctuation enforces objective rules while preserving your original voice and stylistic choices.

How do I modernize English text while preserving quoted historical language?

Modernizing English text while preserving quoted historical language requires establishing a strict boundary around quoted material. Apply modern grammar and punctuation rules only to surrounding prose, keeping original historical quotes completely intact and unaltered.

Can I use an automated rubric to check for English idiom and register failures?

You can use an automated rubric to check for English idiom and register failures. This process uses a structured Principle/Preserve/Rubric workflow to evaluate prose, returning objective pass/fail checks instead of vague subjective judgments.

Why does my English writing review incorrectly flag grammar issues in dialect text?

Your English writing review may incorrectly flag grammar issues in dialect text because the checker applies rigid standard rules without context. A proper correctness review respects cases where dialect or historical form is required instead of forcing modern conventions.