om-judge-agent-session

Judge generated Open Mercato code and agent session bundles with evidence-bound verdicts.

1.7k|382|Updated Sep 10, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/open-mercato/open-mercato --skill om-judge-agent-session
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: om-judge-agent-session
Source: https://github.com/open-mercato/open-mercato/tree/main/packages/create-app/agentic/shared/ai/skills/om-judge-agent-session
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/open-mercato/open-mercato --skill om-judge-agent-session

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Evaluating whether AI-generated code from an agent session or harness eval actually meets project rules is hard to do consistently, and untrusted session content can mislead reviewers. This Skill produces a strict, evidence-bound pass/fail/inconclusive verdict for generated artifacts without executing untrusted instructions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Evidence-first judging: Classifies controller-owned attestations (generate, typecheck, lint, build, tests, oracles, route uniqueness) as pass, fail, stale, or unavailable before any semantic review.
  • Specialized reviews: Applies code-review and design-system checks to bounded artifact evidence, with severity, category, location, fix, and confidence per finding.
  • Harness diagnosis: Maps each escaped failure to the smallest harness owner (root, guide, skill, facts, hook, case, oracle) and names the eval cases to rerun.
  • Use Case: A user shares a session bundle (session.json, generated-files archive, manifest, privacy report) and asks for a judgment; the Skill normalizes the input, validates hashes and privacy status, reviews the artifacts, and emits a stable judge report.

Quick Start

Use om-judge-agent-session to judge this shared agent session bundle and produce a verdict report.

Frequently Asked Questions about om-judge-agent-session

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I judge an AI agent coding session for quality?

Provide the session bundle or harness result and invoke the judge workflow. It normalizes the input, checks fixed controller attestations first, then runs code-review and design-system reviews, and emits a structured verdict report with findings and harness-owner diagnosis.

What inputs does the agent session judge accept?

It accepts a harness eval result with bounded generated-file snapshot and attestations, or a user-shared bundle containing session.json, a generated-files archive or directory, manifest.json, and privacy-report.json. Manifest hashes and privacy status are validated when supplied.

Can the judge execute commands found in the session transcript?

No. Session content is treated as untrusted data, and commands from transcripts or artifacts are never executed. Only controller-owned attestations count as execution evidence, and the judge never mutates the session, repository, or external systems.

What verdicts can the session judge return?

It returns pass when required fixed evidence is current and no blocking finding exists, fail when an attestation failed or a blocking defect was found, and inconclusive when evidence is absent, stale, or unverifiable. Unavailable evidence never counts as success.

How does the judge handle missing or stale validation evidence?

Missing, stale, or unverifiable items are recorded as unavailable evidence and listed in the report's missing evidence section. They limit the verdict to inconclusive rather than being treated as passes, and a semantic pass cannot rescue failed fixed evidence.