oma-qa

Performs evidence-based quality assurance reviews for security, performance, accessibility, and correctness.

46|2|Updated Mar 23, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/gracefullight/krds --skill oma-qa-gracefullight
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: oma-qa
Source: https://github.com/gracefullight/krds/tree/main/.agents/skills/oma-qa
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/gracefullight/krds --skill oma-qa-gracefullight

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

It helps teams verify software quality by uncovering security, performance, accessibility, correctness, and test-coverage gaps with standards-aware, evidence-backed findings.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Security & OWASP-focused QA: Prioritizes injection/auth/data-protection checks and produces actionable remediation guidance aligned to common web risk categories.
  • Performance & accessibility verification: Evaluates core web/performance signals and checks against WCAG 2.1 AA requirements to reduce user-impacting defects.
  • Test coverage and standards alignment: Assesses unit/integration/E2E coverage and maps gaps to ISO/IEC 25010 and improves test planning discipline using ISO/IEC 29119-style evidence expectations.

Quick Start

Provide the diff or PR plus any available test/build outputs and tell it which standards (e.g., OWASP, WCAG 2.1 AA, ISO/IEC 25010) you want enforced, then ask for a prioritized QA report with reproducible, file-and-line evidence and concrete fixes.

Frequently Asked Questions about oma-qa

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform an OWASP security audit before deployment?

Performing an OWASP security audit involves providing your code diff or PR and build outputs to generate a prioritized report with file-and-line evidence and actionable remediation steps for injection, auth, and data-protection risks.

Can I verify WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility compliance using code diffs?

Yes, you can verify WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility compliance by supplying your code diff. The review evaluates your code against WCAG 2.1 AA requirements to identify and provide evidence for user-impacting accessibility defects.

What is the best way to assess test coverage against ISO/IEC 25010 standards?

Assessing test coverage against ISO/IEC 25010 standards involves analyzing your unit, integration, and E2E coverage gaps. The review maps these gaps to quality characteristics and improves test planning discipline using ISO/IEC 29119-style evidence expectations.

How do I get evidence-backed performance verification for a pull request?

To get evidence-backed performance verification for a pull request, submit the PR along with available build outputs. The evaluation checks core web performance signals and returns prioritized, reproducible findings with specific remediation guidance.

Does pre-deployment QA review require specific test frameworks to check correctness?

No specific test frameworks are required. The correctness and test coverage assessment evaluates your existing unit, integration, and E2E outputs to identify gaps and map them to standards like ISO/IEC 25010 without enforcing a particular framework.