omc-plan

To turn a vague feature idea into an actionable work plan, use an adaptive planning workflow that sequentially gathers requirements, explores the codebase, and generates a structured plan with acceptance criteria. This clarifies scope before implementation begins.

Defining acceptance criteria for high-risk requests involves risk analysis and consensus-driven decision making. The planning process produces quality-gated outputs that include architectural critiques and test criteria, ensuring stakeholders align on project requirements before coding.

Gathering missing requirements for feature planning uses an interview mode that asks one focused question at a time. It grounds follow-up questions in codebase facts, ensuring the collected data accurately reflects technical constraints and project scope.

Yes, you can review an existing implementation plan using a dedicated plan review mode. This process evaluates the proposed architecture, surfaces potential risks, and ensures the scope aligns with stakeholder expectations through a final approval flow.

Structured planning supports consensus-driven decision making by producing quality-gated outputs with architectural critique and risk analysis. This ensures all stakeholders review and approve the implementation approach before the development handoff begins.

You should avoid automated planning for simple, well-defined tasks where scope and risks are already clear. The adaptive workflow targets broad, vague, or high-stakes requests, so direct implementation is more efficient when minimal requirements gathering is needed.