omcustom:agora

Orchestrate adversarial reviews among three or more LLMs to identify design flaws.

13|6|Updated Apr 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/baekenough/second-brain --skill omcustom-agora
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: omcustom:agora
Source: https://github.com/baekenough/second-brain/tree/main/.claude/skills/agora
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/baekenough/second-brain --skill omcustom-agora

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

orchestrates a multi-LLM adversarial review loop to identify flaws in designs and specifications, driving toward unanimous consensus.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Adversarial reviews: coordinates 3+ LLMs (e.g., Claude, Codex/GPT, Gemini) to critique designs and uncover edge cases.
  • Configurable workflow: supports rounds, severity thresholds, and model composition, with cross-review and collaborative synthesis.
  • Consensus reporting: automatically aggregates findings into a final consensus report and recommended actions for build or redesign.

Quick Start

Provide a target document path and optional parameters to initiate an Agora adversarial review.

Frequently Asked Questions about omcustom:agora

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How can I run an adversarial design review using multiple LLMs to find architectural flaws?

Multi-LLM adversarial consensus coordinates three or more LLMs, such as Claude and Gemini, to critique software architecture and product specifications. It enforces iterative rounds to drive toward unanimous consensus and eliminate design flaws.

How do I automate consensus reporting for a multi-agent design critique process?

Automated consensus reporting aggregates cross-review findings from agent teams into a final consensus report. It synthesizes critiques from multiple LLMs to output recommended actions for build or redesign.

Can I configure review rounds and severity thresholds for multi-LLm agent teams?

Yes, the adversarial review workflow supports configurable rounds, severity thresholds, and model composition. You can adjust these parameters to control agent-team coordination and cross-review communication.

What is the best way to eliminate edge cases in high-risk product specifications?

The best way to eliminate edge cases in high-risk product specifications is an adversarial review. Multiple LLMs critique the design iteratively until a unanimous consensus is reached and flaws are eliminated.

Does this adversarial consensus process work for documents outside of software engineering?

Yes, adversarial consensus applies to high-risk design documents and product specifications across collaborative environments. It extends beyond software architecture to eliminate flaws in any detailed specification.