omk-flow-bugfix

Guide bug resolution from reproduction evidence to root-cause analysis and minimal code changes.

130|14|Updated Apr 30, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/dmae97/oh-my-kimi --skill omk-flow-bugfix
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: omk-flow-bugfix
Source: https://github.com/dmae97/oh-my-kimi/tree/main/templates/skills/kimi/omk-flow-bugfix
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/dmae97/oh-my-kimi --skill omk-flow-bugfix

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps you turn a reported bug into a reliable fix by guiding you from reproduction to root cause, then validating the outcome with a regression test.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Evidence-driven debugging: Collects the expected vs actual behavior and relevant reproduction details, then uses logs/tests/recent changes to narrow scope.
  • Minimal, safe correction: Identifies the root cause and implements only the smallest fix likely to resolve it.
  • Regression prevention: Adds or updates a regression test and runs targeted quality gates to confirm no recurrence.

Quick Start

Use omk-flow-bugfix to process a bug report end-to-end from reproduction details through minimal fix, regression test, and final verification.

Frequently Asked Questions about omk-flow-bugfix

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I fix a bug using root cause analysis and regression testing?

To fix a bug using root cause analysis, you collect reproduction evidence like expected versus actual behavior, identify the root cause from logs or recent modifications, implement a minimal correction, and add a regression test to verify the resolution.

What's the best way to debug a broken feature after recent code modifications?

The best way to debug a broken feature after recent code modifications is to gather reproduction details, use logs and failing tests to narrow the scope, apply a minimal safe correction, and run targeted quality gates to confirm no regression.

How does evidence-driven debugging work for software verification?

Evidence-driven debugging works by collecting expected versus actual behavior and reproduction context, then using that evidence to narrow scope, identify the root cause, implement a minimal fix, and validate the outcome with targeted tests for software verification.

Do I need failing tests to start a debugging workflow for suspicious regressions?

You do not strictly need failing tests to start a debugging workflow, but having reproduction details like expected versus actual behavior, logs, and recent modification context is required to narrow scope and identify the root cause for suspicious regressions.

Why should I implement a minimal fix instead of a broader code change for bug resolution?

You should implement a minimal fix because it targets the root cause directly and is likely to resolve the bug without introducing new regressions, which is then validated by updating regression tests and running targeted quality gates.