one-three-one-rule

Structure a technical proposal using the 1-3-1 framework: one clear problem statement, three options (A/B/C) with pros and cons, and one recommendation with an implementation plan. This format delivers a concise, auditable decision artifact for stakeholders.

Document tool selection by defining the problem, outlining three distinct options labeled A, B, and C with their respective pros and cons, and providing a single recommended path with a definition of done and implementation plan.

Write an implementation plan by following the 1-3-1 decision format, which requires selecting one recommended course of action from three evaluated options and detailing the definition of done and execution steps for that migration path.

You need a structured decision-making framework for refactoring strategies when multiple viable approaches exist and require a clear recommendation. The 1-3-1 format ensures stakeholder-ready proposals by producing an auditable artifact with defined options and implementation steps.

Yes, the 1-3-1 format applies to any technical decision with multiple viable approaches, including architecture choices, tool selections, refactoring, and migration paths. It formats the problem, three options with pros and cons, and a recommendation into a concise proposal.