one-three-one-rule

A 1-3-1 decision brief is a structured format for options analysis that frames one problem statement, three distinct choices with pros and cons, and one recommendation. Use it for architecture decisions, tooling selections, or migrations requiring stakeholder alignment.

Draft a decision-making brief by defining the problem scope, presenting three options labeled A, B, and C with pros and cons, and delivering a justified recommendation with a definition of done and an implementation plan for stakeholder review.

Yes, the 1-3-1 framework suits major refactors by providing a repeatable template that outlines three approaches with trade-offs and a concrete recommendation, ensuring stakeholders clearly understand the implementation plan and success criteria.

The best way to present options analysis is a 1-3-1 brief that clearly defines scope, inputs, and expected outcomes, then contrasts three approaches with pros and cons before delivering a defendable recommendation with an actionable implementation plan.

Yes, a 1-3-1 decision brief includes defined success criteria, a concrete definition of done, and an actionable implementation plan alongside the problem statement, three options, and final recommendation to guide technical execution.