one-three-one-rule

To structure technical proposals, define one problem statement, present three options with pros and cons, and give a recommendation with an implementation plan. This clarifies trade-offs for architecture decisions.

The best way to present migration trade-offs is generating three distinct options labeled A, B, and C, each with concise pros and cons, followed by a single recommended path with a definition of done.

Yes, you can use the 1-3-1 format for tool selection and refactoring strategies. It provides a structured decision-making framework that delivers three options with trade-offs and a concrete recommendation.

Create a recommendation for architecture decisions by selecting one of three presented options, then define a concrete Definition of Done and a practical Implementation Plan to operationalize the chosen path.

Yes, the decision-making framework requires exactly three distinct options labeled A, B, and C. Each option must include a concise description, pros, and cons before delivering a single recommendation.