one-three-one-rule

Frame technical decisions as a 1-3-1 analysis with options, pros, cons, recommendation, and plan.

Updated Apr 9, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/nadicodeai/argo-agent --skill one-three-one-rule-nadicodeai
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: one-three-one-rule
Source: https://github.com/nadicodeai/argo-agent/tree/main/optional-skills/communication/one-three-one-rule
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/nadicodeai/argo-agent --skill one-three-one-rule-nadicodeai

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Converts ambiguous, multi-option decisions into a structured, repeatable format that yields a clear recommendation and actionable plan.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Generates three distinct options (A, B, C) with pros and cons for each.
  • Produces a single, justified recommendation and a concrete implementation plan.
  • Useful for architecture choices, tooling selections, migrations, and other high-stakes decisions.

Quick Start

Provide a 1-3-1 decision brief for your current task.

Frequently Asked Questions about one-three-one-rule

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is the 1-3-1 rule for technical decision-making?

The 1-3-1 rule is a decision-making framework that structures technical choices into one problem statement, three options with pros and cons, and one clear recommendation to resolve ambiguous architectural or tooling decisions.

How do I format an architecture decision record using a 1-3-1 analysis?

To format a 1-3-1 analysis, define a single Problem sentence, evaluate three distinct options (A, B, C) with pros and cons, state a justified Recommendation, and outline a Definition of Done and Implementation Plan.

When should I use a 1-3-1 framework for migration choices?

Use the 1-3-1 framework for migration choices when facing multiple viable approaches and needing a repeatable format to produce a clear recommendation alongside a concrete implementation plan for high-stakes decisions.

What's the best way to compare tooling selections with multiple viable approaches?

The best way to compare tooling selections is generating three distinct options with pros and cons for each, yielding a single justified recommendation and a concrete implementation plan to ensure crystal-clear decisions.