one-three-one-rule

The 1-3-1 framework is a structured decision-making format that captures one clear problem statement, three labeled options with pros and cons, and a single recommendation with an implementation plan. It reduces ambiguity during architecture reviews and tool selection.

Write an options analysis brief by defining a crisp problem statement, evaluating three options labeled A, B, and C with explicit trade-offs, and selecting one recommendation. Conclude the brief with a Definition of Done and an actionable implementation plan.

You need a structured proposal for tool selection when choosing between competing architectural approaches or refactoring strategies. It enforces a fixed structure to compare trade-offs and delivers a decision-ready output with a definitive recommendation and implementation plan.

Yes, you can use this decision-making format for refactoring strategies. It captures the problem, maps three options with trade-offs, and outputs a single recommendation with a Definition of Done and an implementation plan, enabling fast decision-ready outputs for technical projects.

The best way to present trade-offs is using a fixed 1-3-1 structure. Formulate one problem statement, document three options labeled A, B, and C with explicit pros and cons, and conclude with a recommended option, a Definition of Done, and an implementation plan.