oops

Reproduce, diagnose, fix, verify, and commit infrastructure failures.

218|11|Updated Feb 22, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/poteto/noodle --skill oops-poteto
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: oops
Source: https://github.com/poteto/noodle/tree/main/.agents/skills/oops
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/poteto/noodle --skill oops-poteto

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Infrastructure fix for broken builds, failed tests, stale state, and environment drift across user projects and Noodle-internal state.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Reproduce failures, capture error outputs, and diagnose root causes across Noodle state, environment, and config.
  • Follow a disciplined flow: Reproduce -> Diagnose -> Fix -> Verify -> Commit, ensuring fixes address root causes rather than symptoms.
  • Validate success through rerunning original commands and updating commits with root-cause changes.

Quick Start

Reproduce the failure, diagnose the root cause, apply a fix, verify the fix, and commit the change.

Frequently Asked Questions about oops

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I fix broken builds caused by infrastructure failures and configuration drift?

To fix broken builds caused by infrastructure failures, reproduce the error, diagnose the root cause across environment state and config, apply a targeted fix, verify by rerunning commands, and commit the changes.

What is the best workflow to diagnose and repair environment drift in CI/CD?

The best workflow to diagnose environment drift is a disciplined reproduce-diagnose-fix-verify-commit cycle that enforces checks against state, environment, and configuration validity to guarantee root-cause resolution.

Why do my tests keep failing after fixing the error output, and how can I resolve it?

Tests keep failing after surface fixes because the root cause remains unresolved; identify and repair stale state or configuration drift, then verify the fix by rerunning original commands before committing.

Can I use this approach to recover from stale state across user-project environments?

Yes, you can use this approach to recover from stale state across user-project environments by reproducing the failure, diagnosing root causes across environment and config, and verifying the fix before committing.

How do I verify that a configuration drift fix actually resolves the build failure?

To verify a configuration drift fix resolves the build failure, rerun the original failing commands to validate success, then update your commit with the root-cause changes to ensure environment stability.